Connect with us

News

What we learned from Friday practice at the F1 Canadian GP

Published

on


Formula 1 ended Friday’s practice session for the Canadian Grand Prix with Lewis Hamilton’s fastest time as rain and technical problems left their mark.

The seven-time world champion topped the timetable at the expense of team-mate George Russell in a crucial FP2 session after a brief run in FP1 was caused by problems with the circuit’s CCTV system.

Despite a strong start to the second practice session from Ferrari, the Mercedes duo knocked them out of order ahead of their customary long run, which the team rushed to execute with the looming threat of rain in the second half. task meeting.

Meanwhile, Red Bull’s run to 100th Grand Prix victory got off to a rough start as Max Verstappen could only manage sixth-best overall while team-mate Sergio Perez was on the schedule Eighth – behind titular FP1 champion Valtteri Bottas.

Here’s everything we learned from Montreal’s crazy Fridays.

Bottas tops the first practice session at the track that was cut short by problems with the CCTV system

Bottas tops the first practice session at the track that was cut short by problems with the CCTV system

Photograph: Sam Bloxham / motorsport pictures

story of the day

The opening hour of the race was barely any run as a routine red flag due to a stop by Pierre Gasly after the Alpine driver had an electrical problem with his steering wheel due to a closed circuit on the track The TV system had a glitch of its own, leading to a longer stoppage.

The delay between the CCTV equipment and its output ensured that operations could not be resumed on security grounds and the session was eventually canceled. Teams and drivers were compensated for the extra half-hour on FP2, although Bottas got bragging rights for aborting his best lap record in the opening race.

Although rain was forecast for FP2, the meeting was largely spared the threat of severe weather. A pair of red flags created an unwelcome distraction; Nico Hulkenberg’s car was engulfed in a puff of acrid smoke 30 minutes into the race, forcing the German to stop before Turn 1. Shortly after the schedule resumed, Esteban Ocon was asked to stop at Turn 9 to give Alpine even more headaches and add a further (albeit shorter) delay.

According to the GPS data, the Mercedes was particularly strong in the traction zone.While delta times suggest that Red Bull and Aston Martin provide arguably the best platform in low-speed corners, Mercedes easily makes up time with stronger corner exits

Ferrari initially took the lead in the race, with Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz at the top of the race, but when the race resumed in full swing, the Ferraris were beaten by George Russell. The Briton’s fastest time was short-lived as Hamilton brushed him aside seconds later with a time of 1m 13.718s.

The focus turned to long-distance speed, though engineers looked back when dark clouds began to hover over Notre Dame. Precipitation was expected on the track with 20 minutes to go, but the clouds persisted for another quarter of an hour, offering an opportunity to add a little more mileage.

A flood then hit the northern part of the track, with rain washing out the hairpin corners and ending any traditional running. A few intrepid riders explored these conditions using intermediate tires, but these proved ineffective as standing water intensified in tight times. Still, with the wet weather expected to linger for the rest of the weekend, a cursory experience of the soggy Gilles Villeneuve circuit could come in handy.

Not an easy day for Red Bull as it aims to win its 100th grand prix this weekend

Not an easy day for Red Bull as it aims to win its 100th grand prix this weekend

Photography: Glenn Dunbar/ motorsport pictures

Why Red Bull’s bid for 100th Grand Prix victory faces challenges

Mercedes’ sprint in the second half was due in part to changing its running plan, placing longer runs on medium tires at the start of the race and opting to go all out for soft runs later on. This provided slightly better track conditions for the W14, as the track was slightly rubberier. Russell confirmed this, arguing that the different pace Mercedes chose to approach the session made it difficult to take the timing boards at face value.

Both drivers reported that the track was particularly bumpy, and Hamilton believed that it still needed to work overnight to improve the car’s driving control to ensure a more stable platform for qualifying.

According to the GPS data, the Mercedes was particularly strong in the traction zone. While the delta times showed that Red Bull and Aston Martin provided arguably the best platform in the low-speed corners, the Mercedes easily made up time with stronger corner exits. Take the hairpin, for example, where the Aston Martin was able to navigate the corner with a two-tenths advantage over the W14 – but just over 100 meters later, as the car accelerated, the Mercedes wobbled by more than ten. six seconds.

The Ferrari was stronger in the extreme field as its acceleration seemed to pick up in the second half of the straight. But the SF-23 falls short of the Red Bull and Aston Martin in the cornering phase and cannot match the Mercedes in initial traction. While Sainz cut most of the arrears of Hamilton’s best lap with a strong exit from the chicane, the spike in Hamilton’s throttle trajectory suggested a slight misstep on corner exit.

Red Bull’s struggles were the oddest, with Verstappen leaving the meeting feeling a lot had to be done overnight, giving him a better feeling behind the wheel. Many of the problems he faced seemed to stem from difficulties dealing with curbs and bumps, which could go some way to explaining why he wasted so much time on corner exits. On the exit of the final chicane, Verstappen saved time over Alonso, who had to deal with the often brutal curb at the apex.

In a dry run, if the Ferrari can fine-tune its entry speed, it may be the best candidate to challenge for pole, as the exit can easily be compensated under acceleration. Mercedes, despite its protests, still has a good chance of challenging for the front row prize if traction remains intact on Saturday. It would be foolish to rule out Red Bull, a tempting three-way pole scrap is out of the realm of possibility if conditions remain normal. But the rain could bring more twists and turns. Forecasters predict that precipitation will be omnipresent throughout Saturday’s race, and if that happens then the form will have to be thrown out the window.

Rain expected in Montreal all Saturday

Rain expected in Montreal all Saturday

Photography: Glenn Dunbar/ motorsport pictures

However, race day looks to be mostly dry – if not overcast. In that case, the medium pacing for the longer distances seemed less predictable, as Mercedes started the race again with medium pacing. Hamilton’s best lap times at the Yellow Wall complex fluctuated in the low-to-mid range of around 1min 18s, while Verstappen came in at 1min 17s in the middling Pirelli.

Sainz was less consistent on these tyres; the Spaniard’s runs spanned 1m17 despite being faster than Hamilton on medium runs and sometimes with the speed to beat Verstappen Seconds – 1:18 hurdles, more than the Dutchman’s. But it was here that Leclerc suggested he could give the two-time champion his money if Ferrari kept the tyres; That said, stability is more elusive.

Then there’s the Fernando Alonso factor. Aston Martin ran much shorter on medium tires than the other three teams in the Big Four, but his scattered laps were in the same class as Verstappen and Leclerc. It could all come down to qualifying – if it rains, that’s anyone’s guess.

“I don’t think we can read too much into the timing, obviously we had a fuel-efficient qualifying run towards the end of the track” george russell

what they said

Verstappen: “Of course it’s not very simple to have no runs in FP1, but it’s the same for everyone, at least we have some runs in FP2. I think we still have some work to do. The car is not running at the moment. Not outstanding bumpy, on the side of the road. It’s not too bad, but we definitely need to fine-tune some things. But you see it’s raining now, maybe it will rain tomorrow, but maybe it will be dry again on Sunday. It’s a trickier session , but sometimes you have those days.”

Hamilton: “I love driving this track. It’s super. I love it from the moment you come out of the pits and you’re like yes… so the car doesn’t feel bad, but I think we definitely have some work to do. It’s by far not the best, but it’s not the worst either. So it feels ok, just the bumps. I think everyone struggles with the bumps. So I think We’ve got to improve our ride control and improve our balance through the corners and I think we’ll be fine.”

Russell: “I mean, it was obviously a bit of a weird day, obviously something happened in FP1 and then the extension of FP2. It was a pretty productive session. I don’t think we can get too much into the timing, obviously we do We got our lows ready for qualifying at the end of the stage when the track was faster. It was bumpy there. I do think the upgrades we made to the car in Barcelona helped with the limitations we might have Sexy car specs. We need to find out where we’re going. I think we’re still on the tail end, especially with the pace in qualifying compared to Ferrari and Aston Martin. We always know it’s coming on Sunday to our side, so this is when it matters.”

Can Mercedes, Ferrari or Aston Martin stop Red Bull's domination this weekend?

Can Mercedes, Ferrari or Aston Martin stop Red Bull’s domination this weekend?

Photography: Zak Mauger / motorsport pictures

News

Vandoorne to drive Aston Martin F1 car in Pirelli tyre test at Spa

Published

on

By


Aston reserve driver Vandoorne will share driving duties with team principal Lance Stroll, while Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri will each drive a day for McLaren.

It will be the Belgian’s first time driving an active F1 car on track since December 2020 when he represented Mercedes in Abu Dhabi testing.

While the Spa test will focus on Pirelli’s no-carpet tyres, it will give Vandoorne a valuable opportunity to sample the 2023 car, helping him correlate with Aston Martin’s simulator work.

If either Stroll or Fernando Alonso were unwell at any point for the rest of the season, his life would also be made easier.

The 31-year-old shared the Aston substitute with defending Formula Two champion Felipe Drugovich, and the two took turns on call.

Dubovic drove the AMR23 for two days during the Bahrain test in February, when Stroll was not present, and he had the opportunity to test drive the AMR23. Since then, the Brazilian has continued to rack up more miles in private testing of the 2021 car.

Stoffel Vandoorne, Reserve Driver, Aston Martin F1 Team

Stoffel Vandoorne, Reserve Driver, Aston Martin F1 Team

Photography: Mark Sutton/ motorsport pictures

As well as his role at Aston, Vandoorne is one of McLaren’s backup drivers and his performance at Spa will also make it easier for him to step into the MCL60 should the need arise.

As well as giving him a general feel for downforce levels for 2023, the two cars share the Mercedes powerplant and thus have similar settings on their respective steering wheels.

Also read:

Vandoorne made his F1 debut for McLaren in Bahrain in 2016, replacing current Aston team-mate Alonso.

He then completed two full seasons in 2017 and 2018, the first with Honda power and the second with Renault. He finished 16th at the World Championships in both seasons, with a best finish of seventh.

He was dropped by McLaren at the end of 2018, but has since rebuilt his career in Formula E, winning the 2021-22 championship for Mercedes and serving as an F1 substitute.

He currently drives for the DS Penske Formula E team and is also a substitute for the Peugeot WEC team.

Continue Reading

News

McLaren “true contenders” for F1 best of the rest tag

Published

on

By


McLaren has only scored one point after three rounds in 2023 as it struggles to find the car competitive.

But both Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri have seen plenty of upgrades in recent races, allowing the former to finish second in a row, while Piastri has finished in the top five in each of his past two races.

Despite being 136 points behind second-placed Mercedes in the constructors’ championship, Russell believes McLaren is a real threat for the remainder of the race behind leaders Red Bull.

“Obviously they’re a real contender for second fastest team,” Russell said of Woking.

“Oddly enough, Aston Martin was clearly second at the start of the year.

“And they don’t seem to be that competitive now. Ferrari haven’t made much progress. McLaren has made huge progress.

“So without McLaren we’d be very, very happy with the progress we’ve made. Leading the midfield, widening the gap and closing in on Red Bull.

“McLaren has just fully embraced it. But that makes you optimistic that bigger strides are possible.

“I believe in my team. I think it gives us the confidence and optimism to take this step towards Red Bull.

“We’re not too focused on McLaren, Aston or Ferrari. We’re focused on Red Bull. We’re trying to make that big step.”

George Russell, Mercedes F1 W14

George Russell, Mercedes F1 W14

Photography: Steve Etherington/ motorsport pictures

Russell fought his way back from 18th on the grid at last weekend’s Hungarian Grand Prix, jumping to sixth at the checkered flag after Mercedes strategists told him 11th was his favorite.

Russell was pleased with the final result, but felt it was “proof” of a “missed opportunity” for Hungary.

Also read:

“The strategy tells me that if we maximize everything, the P11 is the most realistic, the P7 is the most realistic,” Russell told Autosport.

“Sixth place without a safety car, without a VSC, it’s a really great result.

“But it also proved that this weekend could be a missed opportunity. I believe I could have gone there with Lewis yesterday, it’s one of my favorite circuits and the car always does well here.

“When you have two cars out there, fighting for second gives you more options, and Lewis is also very strong. If things turned out a little differently, he would also be P2.

“So as a missed opportunity we will learn from it. But the positive side is we are leading Aston and Ferrari.”

Continue Reading

News

Top speed, car sizes, race weekends and more compared

Published

on

By


Formula 1 has relied on junior classes to develop the next generation of drivers, and its teams are eager to snag their brightest talent.

The ‘old’ Formula 2 car was a ruleset rather than its own separate entity, sometimes sharing the grid with F1, and later rule changes made the two cars separate championships.

The second class was renamed the F3000 in 1985 as the series switched to a naturally aspirated engine formula and extended the life of the earlier Cosworth DFV lineage. Throughout the life of the F3000, different engine and chassis suppliers came and went, with companies including Reynard, Lola, Ralt and March among them, all producing cars before the championship became a single specification.

When the F3000 championship began to fade due to declining team interest and declining track quality, the second level of racing was reborn in 2005. Bernie Ecclestone tried to bring the junior championship to F1’s bottom line and, along with Flavio Briatore and Bruno Michel, helped build the GP2 series.

GP2 became the FIA ​​Formula Two Championship in 2017, but many key hallmarks of GP2’s early series have stood the test of time. The GP3 series, a third-tier category designed to compete with the myriad Formula 3 championships around it, was added to the F1 Act in 2010 and became FIA ​​Formula 3 in 2019.

There are major differences in the way F2 is run compared to F1, there are subtle changes in form and there are big differences in the overall performance of the cars. The following are the key areas of comparison between F1 and F2.

F1 vs. F2 – key differences

car

Formula 1

Formula Two

top speed

220+ mph

208 mph

Minimum weight including driver

798 kg

788 kg

DRS?

Yes

Yes

engine size

1.6 liter V6

3.4 liter V6

Approximate Power

1,000 horsepower

620 hp

car size

5.63m x 2m x 0.95m

5.22m x 1.9m x 1.09m

tire size

18 inches

18 inches

game every weekend

One (two for sprint weekends)

Two (one sprint, one feature)

game length

305 km/190 miles

Sprint – 120 km/74.5 miles

Features – 170 km/105.6 miles

team

10

11

driver

20

twenty two

2023 Pole Times – Red Bull Ring

1 point 04.391

1 meter 14,643

2023 Pole Times – Monaco

1 meter 11.365

1 meter 21.053

2023 Pole Times – Silverstone

1 meter 26.720

1 meter 39,832

Current single-spec F2 cars can be seen as simpler, smaller versions of F1 cars

Current single-spec F2 cars can be seen as simpler, smaller versions of F1 cars

Photography: Simon Galloway/ motorsport pictures

What is the difference between F1 and F2 racing?

In F1, each team designs its own chassis according to a set of well-defined technical regulations laid down by the FIA. For the 2022 ruleset, the FIA ​​has updated the wording of the rules to better define the bounding box within which bodies can be developed and build a system more in line with the proliferation of available CAD products.

It features a range of safety systems such as a roll cage, halo and anti-intrusion panels mounted around the monocoque. There are also anti-collision structures on the side, front and rear of the car to minimize the impact on the driver in the car.

F2 is a single-spec series with all teams using the Dallara F2 2018 model. The car and driver must weigh a minimum of 788kg and feature F1 standard safety features such as the aforementioned crash structures and halos. Use only parts supplied by Dallara, Hewland or sold by F2 promoters.

F2 cars use floor venturi tunnels, which F1 adopts in 2022, 40 years after banning ground-effect aerodynamics. These designs aren’t as extreme as those in F1, but they work on the same principle, and the car is also enhanced with front and rear wings to create downforce. Like F1, F2 cars are fitted with a Drag Reduction System (DRS), which operates on the same parameters as its parent series.

While F1 cars typically reach speeds in excess of 220 mph during a race, with DRS switched on, an F2 car could theoretically hit 208 mph at full low downforce.

What is the difference between F1 and F2 tires?

Pirelli supplies all championships on the official F1 ladder, and F2 and F3 also use the Italian company’s rubber.

F2 started using 18-inch tires in 2020, two years before entering F1. F2 tires are slightly narrower than F1 tires and generally have less grip because of the naturally lower speeds of the junior series cars.

There are four dry-weather tire compounds for the F2: hard, medium, soft and supersoft – with the first three using the same white, yellow and red color coding as the F1. Extra soft textures are indicated by purple text on the side walls. Each car is supplied with five sets of dry weather tires per wheel, consisting of two of the prescribed compounds, with a set of “premium” tires to be returned after practice. Three sets of wet tires are also available – the F2 has no intermediate compound.

Tire blankets are banned in F2, meaning drivers must warm up their tires naturally. This often creates a larger offset during the pit stops, with drivers leaving the pits vulnerable to those who have already completed laps in the new group.

The “primary” and “option” compounds (harder tires are the main tires and softer tires are the options) must be used during featured races, and pit stops are required to replace them. Tire parking is allowed during a sprint, but not mandatory. Since only two dry compounds are used each weekend, Pirelli and F2 decide which tire to use before the weekend. There may be a single step in the compound (for example, medium and soft), or there may be a larger step for greater excursions (for example, medium and extra soft).

620bhp Mecachrome F2 engine

620bhp Mecachrome F2 engine

Photography: Sutton Images

What is the difference between F1 and F2 powertrains?

F1 has used a turbo-hybrid system since 2014, with a turbocharger and a motor-generator set on the rear axle to form a hybrid package. The internal combustion engine is a 1.6-liter V6. By 2022, F1 engines run on E10 fuel, where 10% of the fuel composition consists of combustibles of biosourced origin.

The MGU-K in an F1 car can produce up to 160bhp for a total power output of around 1000bhp. Figures for F1’s current four powertrain manufacturers (Ferrari, Mercedes, Renault and Red Bull Powertrain) vary but are all believed to have efficiencies in excess of 50%.

F2’s single-spec powertrain is produced by French manufacturer Mecachrome, which briefly participated in F1 in 1998 and 1999, and took over Renault’s engine program. The Mecachrome unit was a 3.4-litre V6 engine, virtually the same one used in the F3, but with a modified turbocharger from Van der Lee. It produces around 620bhp and is driven by a six-speed Hewland gearbox.

To ensure fairness in powertrain supply, Mecachrome units are randomly assigned to teams, as there may be minor differences in overall power output.

F2 is currently being used as a test bed to assist F1 in developing more sustainable fuel, using Aramco-produced fuel with 55% of its content from sustainable bio-sources, with the aim of increasing this figure to 100% by 2026/27. The Saudi oil brand replaced longtime supplier Elf as the sole producer of the F2 fuel.

How much does F1 cost compared to F2?

In recent years, Formula 1 has been constrained by a cost cap of about $135 million through 2023, with some minor adjustments for inflation and other ancillary costs. The cost cap covers most development and operating costs, but excludes driver salaries, salaries of the team’s three highest-paid employees, travel costs and marketing expenses. As Red Bull found out in 2022, violating this cap carries a range of penalties depending on the extent of the overrun.

The bulk of this budget comes from the FIA’s prize money, investment and sponsorship mix. Some teams, such as Red Bull and Mercedes, are self-sufficient in terms of bonuses and sponsors and do not require direct input from their ownership structures.

F2 teams have much smaller budgets, and with the series’ fairly limited reach, teams will rarely start the season with a full sponsor portfolio ready to fund every race. As such, drivers should pay for their rides through their own sponsors or a driver academy.

Depending on the team, the budget of an F2 driver can vary from 2 million to 3 million euros, and can even exceed this budget to get a seat in a better team. To keep costs down, F2 limited the number of employees working on each car on race weekends and designed the cars to be relatively cheap. A team can buy a complete F2 car, without the engine, for around 500,000 euros.

George Russell, Lando Norris and Charles Leclerc are recent notable F2 graduates entering F1

George Russell, Lando Norris and Charles Leclerc are recent notable F2 graduates entering F1

Photography: Glenn Dunbar/ motorsport pictures

How do drivers get from F2 to F1?

To compete in F2, drivers must hold an A or B international FIA license. They cannot conduct private tests on F2 machines, only the group tests offered by the series. There are also restrictions on the single-seater cars that drivers can test in private, and if a driver is double-duty in another category, they must commit to racing in F2 in the event of any conflict.

Depending on a driver’s final standing at the end of the F2 season, they may receive Superlicense points to help qualify for F1. To obtain a super license to compete in F1, a driver needs to earn 40 points.

The distribution of Super License points is:

end of season position

SL points

first place

40

second place

40

third place

40

fourth place

30

the fifth place

20

sixth place

10

Number 7

8

number 8

6

No.9

4

No. 10

3

These can be applied cumulatively over the course of three seasons.

F1 VS F2 weekend format

F1 has been running in the same basic format for years, with FP1 and FP2 taking place on Fridays, each one hour long. FP3 races are also one hour long and take place on the Saturday before the three-stage qualifying format in place since 2006. F1 races must be at least 305 kilometers in length (excluding Monaco) and must not exceed two hours in duration, with a three-hour window if any red flags are raised.

However, sprint weekends are different and that changes for 2023. The only practice session kicked off with Friday’s race, followed by qualifying for Sunday’s Grand Prix. Sprint qualifying and the race are both held on Saturdays, with 2023 seeing six sprint weekends for added variety.

F2 has a practice session lasting 45 minutes on Friday, with a half-hour qualifying session later in the day. It’s effectively a time trial and drivers just need to maintain the fastest lap at the end of the race to secure pole for Sunday’s race.

Many F1 teams have junior drivers in F2 teams

Many F1 teams have junior drivers in F2 teams

Photography: Red Bull Content Pool

The sprint race takes place on Saturday, using the same grid as qualifying, but with the top ten swapped. The number of laps “equal to the minimum number of complete laps over a distance of 120 km (100 km in Monaco)”, according to the 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 scoring system, the score is finally dropped to eighth place, and the fastest lap points are awarded to the top 10 competitors.

The F2 weekend’s featured race “should be equal to the minimum number of complete laps over a distance of 170km (140km in Monaco, 160km in Budapest)”. It features mandatory pit stops where drivers must use both primary and optional compounds during the race. If a driver pits before completing the sixth lap, the mandatory stop does not count. This information is also not recorded if a driver stops under the Virtual Safety Car unless they are already in the pits when the VSC is triggered.

F2 attempted three weekend races in 2021, but the practice was generally unpopular and canceled for 2022 due to gaps left on the calendar. Prior to this, the main race was held on Saturday, and the starting position of the sprint race was determined by the results and the reversal of the top eight.

Continue Reading

news